However, that creative choice actually works better for a horror story, as it's impossible to feel anything but empathy for Cecilia's plight, and anything but contempt for Adrian's willingness to hurt anyone necessary to get what he wants. One assumes if he were to protect her, it would only be due to that feeling of ownership, not any genuine desire to keep her from harm. That's a sharp contrast to Adrian, who while he claims to care for Cecilia, clearly sees her as his personal property more than anything else. After being shot by police, he even apologizes to her for his actions as he dies. In fact, once he's become murderously unhinged, Jack still exhibits affection for Flora and protectiveness over her. No such abuse themes are present in the 1933 Invisible Man film, because as mentioned, Jack was a nice person before becoming corrupted by his discovery. While things get worse once he turns invisible, Adrian had already been Cecilia's personal boogeyman long before that. ![]() It's also implied that he's sexually assaulted her as well, due to his desire to conceive a child, which she tries to avert by secretly using birth control pills. Beyond the physical abuse, which he repeats while invisible, Cecilia tells her friends James and Sydney how Adrian had taken over every aspect of her life, influencing her every movement, thought, and action. Cecilia exhibits telltale symptoms of PTSD, and after first leaving Adrian, can barely walk outside due to worries that he'll appear and recapture her, or do something even worse. In the final film, this message is far from subtle, but considering how many people suffer domestic abuse in real life everyday, one could argue the horrific realities of those situations warrant hammering home. It's been apparent since the first trailer that the real horror lurking behind The Invisible Man is that of domestic abuse. So in a way, The Invisible Man 2020 is just continuing an established tradition by making some notable changes to the 1933 film, albeit much bigger ones. The Griffin on the page is also a deranged villain before he even becomes invisible, while Jack in the film turns evil only due to the side effects of his invisibility serum. ![]() For one, the titular character was only called Griffin in the novel, while he's named Jack Griffin in the movie. While The Invisible Man 1933 was a mostly faithful adaptation of Wells' book, it did make some notable changes. Related: The Invisible Man’s Ending & Twists Explained The Invisible Man movie was of course based on the popular novel by legendary sci-fi author H.G. Regardless, the original remains a well-regarded film among the horror fans of today. Its success led to four sequels of varying quality, the most recent released way back in 1944, and the titular villain also met the comedy duo Abbott and Costello in a 1951 crossover outing. Still, The Invisible Man is an entertaining villain, and his original 1933 movie was both a critical and commercial smash.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |